How Close Are You To The Pixar Characters?

Really? I

always saw the teenage years as a time when an individual needs the most support, and fictional characters are

some of the perfect substitutes for comfort and love, even though they have no power of giving it in their own

terms…but still supply compassion anyway…without knowing it.

So yeah – you definitely have a point

there, and I agree with you completely. Characters I love are almost like fictional brothers to me (since all the

cartoons I like are boys), just like Dory is special to you. :wink:

I

have an uncle who is really close to the movie and characters of cars. One of the reasons why is because he loves

racing.

Mitch:

Hehe, I like

your statement about characters being almost like brothers to you and that they’re all the opposite gender from

you too! (LoL, how funny!)

In the term of your first paragraph in your reply,
I don’t mean every

teenager to say, but I see that the majority has that I what I said in the quote of

my words on your post, especially as the move onto their late teen years as

well.
[b][u]For a fictional individ having power of giving comfort and

love[/u][/b]:
Hmm, I truly do Not see from my own

experiences that they would not be able to at all, especially Love. I will say they cannot give it like we can

towards everyone else that we see in this world, of course because they truly do not exist physically as we do.

But since these kinds of subjects involve with the transmission of different feelings and especially

communication, I do see that as long you truly and definitely keep a character you really love inside your very

own heart, I see that they can be able to when you need them to. For this reason, look at all of the ficitional

individs that have been created with affection from the creators themselves and not that of those that were only

created for the money or only because in order to create an Ani film, especially in Pixar. There are ways to find

out whether if the person or people who brought the character to existent, was either because of the money or if

they really did care about the individual they were bringing about. If they were bringing the individ to

existence for money, then definitely no communication was being made inside themselves to the character that was

forming in their ideas, truly. But if they were doing it because they were either needed or they did have

affection on creating that character, then there was communication evident in the process of bringing that

individual to life by the creator(s) themselves.

Second paragraph, I have to say, it seems we are in a

good line there especially with the Gender part :smiley:
For me and truly, Dory, is

presumably the only real Female individual I have that is animated and in movie part as well. To think of it all,

She is particularly the only one on the opposite gender side from me that has illustrated the most for me in my

life that none of the rest who are all guy characters in the past have been able to

do.
Dory, is some of a complicated individual for

me. It seems She has a mix of everything, to say :confused:
But I do see Mr. Stanton did have his ways when he ever

thought about bringing such a kind, vivid, and warm-hearted individual to life as I see anywhere of Dory in any

state. From what I saw in the movie, and everywhere else.

Heheh – thanks! Yeah, I don’t have any

brothers…so any male cartoon character that I really seem to love are almost like fictional brothers to me.

I’ve always wanted a brother, but that ain’t gonna happen… (snigger)

[quote="Dory’s

Defender"]
I do see that as long you truly and definitely keep a character you really love inside your very own

heart, I see that they can be able to when you need them to.
[/quote]
Yep – that’s exactly

what I meant. Although they are not physically alive in the world as we know it, they do “exist” in our

minds and hearts. :wink:

Dory seems to be one of the most

complicated, yet the most simple of all the Pixar characters ever created on paper and in a computer form. Her

views and opinions on matters are all formed in a very child-like state that is easily comprehensible, but

herself as a character is rather complicated at times. So yeah – I see what you mean.

Well, remember

this about the developmental process of the entire FN project at Pixar. For Mr. Stanton, just as Marlin and Nemo

were brought about some years before they were on the computer screens and drawings for the production, which was

the real lead development of the movie, Dory, was also as well.
The year 1997 was

the year that Stanton started writing the first draft of the script of the movie. When he had made it through the

first part of the entire thing, he had the thought of someone accompanying Marlin on his quest to find his son.

But it was not actually Dory that was to be the one to be with Marlin to the end. Rumor has it that the one that

was to accompany Marlin was a male character that was developed towards a member of the tank gang which I will

not say on this reply post.
It was not until as am pretty sure you have heard in the FN visual commentary of

the entire movie that Stanton saw a sitcom of comedian Ellen Degenres pertaining to the idea that gave Stanton

the ability to think about the creation of Dory. Although, it was that of Degenres that gave him the click in him

to bring Dory to existence and break that barrier that kept him stuck on that part of the script in where he was

not going anywhere good with the first thought.
Yet, even if Dory’s form was simple to visualize and show,

individual wise, She has so much vividness in herself but not realized by many of us as the common side of Her,

tends to lay on the memory problem that is used to make Her funny in many cases.
I don’t see all of Dory’s

thoughts based on that of complete innocence of a child. Although Her normal behavior is of something as that,

Her intelligence is of the real ‘thing’ neither child or adult like. The reason why Stanton used the term of

child-like was because of the fact that by the time many adults are ‘adults’, they already have these newly

learned behavior characteristics that can often result in corruption in different

areas of their lives. Dory on the other hand, has not learned or known these things like many of us do when we

begin to grow upon after being born. We see things such as anger, violence, and so forth from other people older

then us and then on other such things like movies for example, and then we begin to retain them in our brain and

experiences.

But even if our Blue fish friend knew things like those before already without being erased

from her memory problem, I still do not see She would not be as kind or warm-hearted as She is as we know

it.
Her intelligence is great, and I do know She was meant to have an extreme kind heart no matter if Dory was

to have the memory problem or not.
And then She is comical herself in many ways, (facially, thoughtfully, and

then also from Her memory problem as we both know :slight_smile: ).

Ditto, there- I’m an only child, and no matter how many friends you

have, summer holidays are always relatively lonely. Randall is always useful company. :smiley:

You know what they say … you

can only want it really bad until u have it … then you don’t care .

Having four sisters , I would do

anything to be an only child again ( Although I have 2 older sisters , three of my sisters are step-sisters ) .

Maybe this is why Doc can say “It’s Just An Empty Cup” . :wink:

lizardgirl:

Isn’t that

one of the best basis about having a fictional person in mind? :wink:
You keep them truly in your heart and

they can always be with you no matter where you are or what happens to you.
For me, i’ am an only brother in

my family. I have 2 sisters. But they don’t usually like to hang around with me much of the time at all. So

basically, i’m on my own many times when I’ am at home, except for some occasions.
But when I’ am, I always

try to go for my plush of Dory and keep Her next to me wherever i’m doing something in my room. Even then I

always try to keep in mine that She can be with me no matter where I be, even if I don’t have Her with me, being

that of the plush.