With the sequel coming in just about a month or so, there are a few questions that haunt me. Is it going to be better than the first one? Will it actually have transformers talking to and fighting with each other? Or will it be goofy gags, shots of Megan Fox’s abs and Shia stuttering “no,no,no,no,no,no,no” every 10 minutes? Let us uncover the truth that many TF fan wannabes had seemingly ignored for so long. Let us be reminded of the shallowness that is Micheal Bay’s Transformers movie franchise.
Like every other ‘Generation X’ kid who grew up watching it, and ‘Generation Y’ fans that rediscovered it, I’m sure many of you had always fantasize what a live action Transformers movie would look like. Now it’s finally a reality, and while my main reaction to the movie had been, “Holy freaking crap! That looks awesome!” there’s a part of me that thinks, it doesn’t seem true enough to the cartoon. So let’s take some time to review the movie and prepare ourselves before we go to the theaters so we’ll not be unpleasantly surprised, because if there’s anything to be learned from the Transformers, it’s that we should always look deeper, because there’s always more than meets the eye.
Transformers: The In-Depth Movie Review
Not a lot of fans were happy with the choice of Micheal ‘Bad Boys’ Bay as the director of this beloved childhood rite of passage. In a perfect world, this:
Transformers
A Micheal Bay Film
would had look like this
Transformers
A JAMES CAMERON Film
Now that would have totally rocked, and while Mr. Bay don’t have the story and character skills of Mr. Cameron, it’s hard to argue the fact the he knows how to turn tire squeals and engine churn into a connective symphony of rubber and metal. He wants the visual to rock us.
Let’s see what he’s talking about (note the Starscream transformation in the middle of the clip):
youtube.com/watch?v=ZWYatHRo … D&index=11
Holy crap. Let’s see that again in slow motion!
Can’t argue with that. So in terms of the direction, I was sold. But what about the story?
cue the old '80s Transformers animated series theme song
That’s how the 1996 movie began, with a cool, tough, deep-toned narrator voice, telling us that the Transformers were already at war, and in only 20 minutes, Optimus and Megatron were fighting to the death. So what did I expect from the 2007 movie?
Both writers (Bob Orci and Alex Kurtzman, both co-writers of Mission: Impossible III and The Island’s screen play, with Alex also being writer and executive producer of Alias) were fans of the original show, and combined, have a solid track record for writing action with Sci-Fi elements. The major factors in making Transformers live action would be removing all the illogical cartoon physics that plagued the original show. Once you get over the nostalgia, you’d realize Transformers doesn’t place much concerns over logic.
Just to name a few things:
- How does Megatron transform into a gun that 1/100 its original size? Thankfully, the writers of the new movie had probably seen Terminator 2.
- How does Soundwave have room for all those tapes,
- how is Astrotrain able to transform into a train that’s big enough to hold everyone else, even a fully formed Devastator, whom we TF fans know is freaking huge,
- and of course, where the heck does Optimus Prime’s trailer go when he transforms?
Only kids crack out on Lucky Charms cereal don’t notice this kind of obvious crap, so I was all the more for logical Transformers. But I couldn’t quite help wonder, why are there so many human characters in a movie about robots? What the heck?!
cue '80s Transformers theme song
In the 1986 movie,
- Decepticons come to Earth in an Autobot ship,
- then the two sides laser-blast each other all night,
- then Optimus shows up in a ship,
- then Megatron, who’s now Galvatron, shows up with a handful of other ships,
- and finally, the Autobots escape by blasting off into outer-space,
all without being detected by any advanced military defense system, which again, is illogical, because as we all know, in 1986, the US had WOPR, which could deploy planes, troops, missiles, and play Tic Tag Toe.
Now while it does make sense to have more human interaction in the new movie, doesn’t it seem a little light on the robot side? Just to put some numbers out there, the 1986 movie had speaking roles for two humans and over 50 Transformers - Micheal’s movie is the opposite, 50 humans, and only 13 Transformers.
And speaking of speaking, the only original voice actor that returned was Peter Cullen, AKA Optimus Prime. Megatron was voiced by Hugo Weaving. Yes, that’s right - Agent Smith.
What the heck?!
cue '80s Transformers theme song
The voice of Barricade was Keith David, and Starscream, originally played by Chris Latta, who’s also known as Cobra Commander, had an all new voice actor, because sadly, Chris died in 1994, which brings up the question, why not use Frank Welker, the original Megatron? He’s alive and well, and interestingly enough, was voicing Megatron in the Transformers video game based on the live action movie.
Apparently, after auditioning for the new movie, he was told his voice didn’t fit Megatron’s new design. No duh he doesn’t fit.
That’s supposed to be Megatron?!
cue '80s theme song
Now obviously, to maker the Transformers look realistic, the robot designs had to be a little more intricate, but couldn’t they had at least made them look a little more like their cartoon selves, especially with their faces?
Optimus is the perfect example:
Then
and now.
His body looks like his real truck and robot form, and his face look like his classic self. An overall great job - minus the red flames. And while the bodies of the other Transformers look live action accurate, their faces are horrible. Why do they all look like robot spiders? With the way they all look, if you take Optimus out of the movie, there’s not a whole lot that looks ‘Transformer-ly.’
It could be called, “Super Morphing Outerspace Fighting Robots” and nobody would be able to tell the difference. It would be a perfectly good, CGI, action, sci-fi robot movie on its own. It’s missing too many classic characters:
- Devastator,
- The Dinobots,
- The Insecticons,
- and of course, everyone’s favorite, Soundwave, who would definitely be redesigned and would probably ended up looking like this:
So why call it Transformers if the materials’ being changed so drastically? Probably because the name has a huge built-in audience, and that’s gonna equal huge freaking profits.
cue theme song
Screenwriter William Goldman once said, “Nobody in Hollywood knows anything,” essentially meaning that for any given project, no matter the stars, the director, budget, or buzz, box office failure is always a possibility. But the last nine years have altered that wisdom. Now it goes: “Nobody knows anything, except trilogies are guaranteed to make a freaking load of money.”
Imagine, knowing that every two years that at least one of your projects will make 200 to 400 million dollars worldwide so then, trilogy-worthy concept is Hollywood’s Genie in a bottle, which grants three insanely profitable movies. And searching for this ‘Trilogy Genie’ had given rise to a new trend called the “Reboot,” which basically means discarding all previous continuity of an established series and starting over from the beginning. This allows for recycling of old, forgotten, and out-of-touch franchises to start fresh.
That’s why Transformers had been rebooted, 'coz the studio wanted to appeal to two large segment of its audience: Die hard fans and those who don’t know much about it, but still want to see it because it looks cool. And appealing to a huge audience becomes even more important when trying to create a franchise, so that’s why many of the popular characters had to be held back from the first movie so that there will be something new to advertise in the sequels to make audiences come back for more.
So, be aware that these two movies are Act 1 and 2 of a 3-act trilogy, and Act 1 must introduce all the characters, establish the conflict, and hint those elements that will appear in future sequels, which caused much impatience to the die-hard fans, because they wanted to get to the transforming, and the robot-fighting.
The Dragon of Omnipotency rates Transformers
- Worthy of big screen viewing, on a weekend night, in a packed theater.
- No matter how many times you see the previews, your reactions are always Holy Crap That Looks Awesome.
- It’s a Special Effects Lover’s Wet Dream, and
- it’s a creation of a Trilogy Syndrome.
End of Part 1 of review. Stay tuned for Part 2.