Theoretically, at least some of Muntz’s dogs have to be female, or the dog pack would have died out long ago. All the dog voices we hear are male - but all the dog voices we hear also belong to the “guard dogs.” Muntz being of an older generation might assign the dogs jobs based on old fashioned male/female roles, so the guard dogs might be all male, while the female dogs have other roles. We don’t hear voices from the “staff” dogs, including the one dusting the skeleton, the ones with the dinner menu and champagne, the ones who serve dinner, etc., so any of them might be female.
There are definitely female Monsters working at MI, and I would expect there are female scarers and assistants, they just aren’t identified. The lack of female Grasshoppers in ABL wouldn’t seem odd except for the scene where they’re hanging out at the sombrero - you’d think some of the guys would have girlfriends hanging around. Other than that, we only see the Grasshoppers as this “biker gang”/mob harrassing the ants, and it would make sense that the “gang” is all male.
The lack of obviously female rats doesn’t bother me because, as you say, there are very few rats in Ratatouille with even incidental speaking roles.
It might be nice if they had a more apparent mix of male/female in the “group” characters, where it made sense, but I don’t know if they don’t think about that, or if there are other reasons (they don’t want to use female voices on the “mean” dogs, they needed ALL the Grasshoppers to leave the sombrero after Hopper’s “motivational” speech, so no girls hanging around, etc.).
Switching back slightly to a comment about significant female characters (Major TS3 Spoiler ahead): [spoil]I think they did a really wonderful job with Bonnie in TS3, and props to them for not assuming that Andy’s toys had to go to another little boy. I think Bonnie is a wonderful character because she’s so real and engaging and doesn’t fall into the easy stereotypes of the “tomboy” or the “pretty princess” - she’s just this cute, funny, imaginative kid.[/spoil]
Once again, I don’t have a problem with the lack of females in pixar movies!
But I think what other people have problems with, is that yeah there are female dogs and monsters and rats. they just have a problem that they’re not shown. That they’re not featured or appriciated.
No need for rudeness. After all, is there really any harm in noticing and discussing such things?
Nobody is denying that Pixar females exist, we’re just discussing how, in the Pixar universe, they’re not as frequently depicted as males. No need for anyone to get defensive about it - as far as I’m concerned it’s just a friendly, laid-back discussion.
Thank you to ellie-jessie-eve and karly05 for their thoughtful responses to my post.
sigh here we go again .I not getting defensive about anything.I’m voicing my opinion just like you are.Sorry if I came off rude I’m just in [spoil]PMS[/spoil] mode,and I tend to word things diffrently…
Really, I don’t mind the female-to-male ratio in animated films, as long as they don’t claim one gender to be better than the other. And girls in movies are always either cutesy or tomboyish. Or something in between. What ever went wrong with female nerds, for one? I’d like to see a female nerd in an animated feature once…
But then make a female character (especially if it’s an animal) TOO tomboyish and people will assume she’s a guy…[/i]
In response to the question about female scarers in Monsters Inc., during the advert that Mike and Sulley watch at the begining a female monster in a hard hat turns around and says “I’m Monsters Incorperated”. Then Sulley goes “Hey, it’s Betty!” I’m pretty sure she was supposed to be a scarer/ assisstant - I might be forgetting parts of the moment though.
In the end I’m not really bothered by the fact that there are more boys than girls in their films. I do hope that they make more films with female protagonists after Brave though.
Just an odd thought. Could this be considered off topic?
In Monsters Inc, Betty (and Marge) are both the only clearly identified females who work on Sulley’s scare floor, and they are both assistants (and the latter of which is only really identificable as female due to her name, as she’s spoken to by Mike:
“Hey, Marge, hey how was jury duty?”).
I… guess one or two of the other scarers who never spoke could be female too since all but Randall have their surnames up there (I would have assumed Marge was male otherwise if it wasn’t for her name. Seriously.) But then I 'd have to see whether or not they were all seen in the locker room/rest room (which are likely to be seperated on the basis of gender really aren’t they).
Sometimes gender is pretty easy in Monsters Inc (Celia and Roz versus Waternoose and Sulley) though it can be hard to tell with some of the monsters. At least it is with Marge without her obvious name!
It makes me wonder if mistakes ever happen when the physical diversity of people there is so large. Do people get… mixed up?
Perhaps they’re simply more used to looking out for little things and indications unlike a human so it isn’t as much of a bother, or it’s just an occasional social faux pas on the level of getting someones age wrong. In some cases because it’s understandable while embarassing and a little insulting depending on the person and how personally sensitive they are to that sort of thing. IDK.
Yes I am aware this is a very random thought to be having. But I did get an odd thought when I thought back to the slow motion scarer walk, one of the monsters does make me wonder on their gender on some level too.
Well, I’m guessing that in the Monster world, either most monsters get used to being mistaken for the opposite sex and there isn’t anything offensive about it, or that monsters can pick up on visual clues that tell each other what their gender is. Like movement or something a human couldn’t see about their physical person. Clothes and makeup might be used by some monsters to make it clear what sex they are.
Yeah, I thought that some of the scare floor monsters looked more typically feminine.
Maybe the males and females look different to each other, and we don’t notice because we don’t see them every day, and…we’re not monsters. It’s like a stupid hick mixing up a Japanese man with a Taiwanese man, sort of. No experience in the field, and they all look the same.
I know that this had probably been said before, but wasn’t the main emotional storyline with EVE rather than the titular character himself? I mean, WALL•E sort of remains as a static character throughout the entire film and it’s really EVE’s emotional storyline that we follow. She’s the one that ultimately changes in the film, so I always thought of her being the main protagonist.
You make a good point there, Pixar Builder. Wall-E never changes as far as personality goes, so I guess they just decided by the movie’s name that he was the main, although Nemo isn’t the main character in Finding Nemo…
I could care less if the character is male or female,although my favorite Pixar character is Sally… 
