en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A113# … of_section
The a113 article is in danger of being destroyed! Please link any references you have for specific A113 in the article!
Sorry, but Wikipedia is evil. I can’t help you.
Then what was the point of posting that A113? 
I hate those Wikipedia discussions, why do people have to be like that?
I like Wikipedia, but some people on there really have nothing else to do but delete, delete, delete, how low is that?!
You said it, Martin.
I’ll try to helplp out…but I think I missed the fabled happening that caused all of PixarPlanet to despise Wikipedia…can someone elaborate?
That’s not true, it’s mostly A113, he just made it VERY public. It’s his opinion and I respect it, though.
Anyways, Wikipedia strives to be the most complete encyclopedia on the net, yet the members debating the A113 article are saying they wnat to take out any non-Brad Bird Pixar references and other A113 references becasue there are no notable articles on it (that they know of). Why don’t they just pop in a DVD and see for themselves!!! But that’s considered original research so it’s not allowed, therefore Wikipedia will never be complete with all the annoying guys with no lives trying to prove everyone wrong. Basically if enough people voted, Wikipedia could have an article about how unicorns exist in Australia. I like reading and doing research there, of course (definitely NOT about Pixar though, they’re increasingly wrong in that department) but what goes on behind the scenes is ridiculous.
agreed. Well all research was original at one point, so that means no research is allowed!
Why doesn’t someone write a blog about all the non-Bird A113 references and post it online, then use that as your “cite” when editing the A113 article? I dunno how Wiki works myself, but it sounds like that could potentially shut this guy up.
You almost killed me with your sense of humor. XDDDDD…etc.
Let Wickedpedia die, everyone. They will eventually kill themselves. In the meantime, take the teacher’s advice and research it yourself instead of letting the Wikipedia Monster do it for you!
A113, I am not going to argue with you again, but there isn’t anything wrong with wikipedia. It hasn’t caused any fatal death to anyone. It can get annoying at times.
The key to remember about Wikipedia is cites. If you find an article that is properly researched and provides cites, then just click on those links and cite those sources instead of citing Wiki! Wikipedia isn’t the devil that your school teachers tell you it is. It isn’t proper to use it as a cite for a school paper or even business paper, but it is still a useful tool and people shouldn’t be trying to “kill” it simply because there are trolls who like to add misleading edits. Wiki gets more right than they do wrong, because they have people who take care of and maintain it. Just because occasionally things go wrong, doesn’t make it something that is not a valid source of casual information (note: not business or school). The Encyclopedias you can buy in stores aren’t always completely valid or even all that well researched either, but no one is claiming they should be shut down or die.
A113 - You could have put your anti-Wikipedia energy into coming up with a good article for keeping the “A113” page on there, by now. All of your anti-Wikipedia points have been refuted in that thread you made in the off-topic section anyway, and your “death to wikipedia” posts are not helpful and can get quite annoying, if it wasn’t so tragically funny how you bring it up all the time. sigh Sometimes, all I can do is laugh at some of the things you say…