Aardman and Dreamworks Split

Basically, Aardman and Dreamworks had a five film deal, I think, and only after having released three

films, (Chicken Run, Were Rabbit and Flushed Away) Dreamworks feels that they’re not making enough profit out of

the deal, and have from Aardman. They’re saying it’s something about creative differences, but the real reason

is obvious, since Flushed Away suffered a major loss and neither Chicken Run or Curse of the Were Rabbit (despite

being critically acclaimed and award-winning) made as much as Dreamworks would have liked. There’s more info

here-

animated-news.com/2007/dream … -official/

Yeah, I heard about this on [i]Animated News and

Views[/i] as well. Not such a big shock, as – despite the rumors – everyone most likely saw it

coming. After Flushed Away did so badly it’s not surprising that they finally

decided to split after all these years, though I must say that I’m quite jolted to hear that

Chicken Run didn’t do as well as DreamWorks had hoped. I thought it was a hit both

in the reviews and box office sections? Oh well…

Thanks for the posting up the information,

lizardgirl. :wink:

Yeah, too bad. It seemed like a good partnership. Meanwhile, Aardman is at work

making their next feature, Crood Awakening. There is no word on a distributor

yet.

I

can’t help but wonder: Why do Aardman movies do poorly in America? Is it that

America doesn’t get how British they are? If it is, then that’s a darn shame,

because British people understand and enjoy American films.

Ouch XD

Rumours have been circulating about that for a while now (sort of last octoberish? Murmurs at a festival I went

to) but neither of them had really made any statements about it since… The rumour from back then was that

Aardman was unhappy being pushed out of their niche stop-motion work because Dreamworks wanted to budget cut and

use CGI for Flushed Away, and they were splitting due to differences of opinion/work method/ethics, though!

RMS - Search me. I always thought that – with the

exception of Flushed Away – Aardman’s films did very well with the American crowd?

Maybe that’s just because, since I grew up on their films and shorts, I am just so used to them I already think

they’re wonderfully hilarious. I guess it just depends on one person’s opinion – whether they like Aardman’s

productions or not is for them to decide. I don’t know how anyone could not like British humor, though… :laughing:

:stuck_out_tongue:

RMS-

I’ll probably have to agree with you, there. Curse of the Were Rabbit is about as British as an animated film

can get (I mean, Wallace wears a tank top! :laughing:) and though I’d usually say that this would therefore mean that

audiences around the world would find it very entertaining not only because of the jokes, but because of the

different kinds of jokes that are made. But it seems that in this case, it didn’t

work as well as it could’ve.

Not to worry though- Nick Parks has assured Wallace and Gromit fans that

they will be back, though whether or not the next project is a feature film is uncertain at the

moment.

vimfuego- It seems as though the split was for two reasons- the money

side, and the creative differences side. It’s possible, perhaps even probable, that if the Aardman films had

made more money than Dreamworks had expected, the deal would still be on and they’d be able to surpass their

creative differences. Also, if they all got on creatively, but had suffered finacially, they still may have

continued. In this case, both factors were negative and Dreamworks just weren’t having any of it, I

guess.

To be honest, I’m pleased- Aardman and Dreamworks represent very different sides of the animation

industry, and it seemed as though they’d never go that well together.

Ah, no, I’m pretty sure that’s dead.

Check out this article I found:

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6315963.stm

I’m actually quite glad about the split. Not that

DreamWorks has no redeeming qualities, but I’ve always had the feeling that DreamWorks’ influence would ruin

Aardman in the long run. Now that the partnership is over, we’ll never know whether that really would have

happened or not, but at least Aardman will have more creative freedom over its projects. Aardman is the Pixar of

claymation, in my opinion, and I certainly want them to make many more great movies.

By the way, as an

aside, I haven’t seen Flushed Away. I wasn’t impressed with the trailer, but I

hope the actual movie is good.

Interesting. Although I havent seen those movies, i personally cant say I have anything against British humor or

Britishness. In fact, I love it! But I suppose I could see how America as a whole may not be into that.

Heheh…

I can’t tell you how glad I am that they split! :smiley:
DW and Aardman were [i]very different

[/i]movie companies and really needed to part. I think less of the Box

Office as a reason for their split and more that they couldn’t get along in creating a great story. Plus, DW in

an article over there at Animated-news is keeping the schedule to just two movies a year (after saying before it

was going to be three eventually) and increasing the production to four years. Without Aardman, DW can focus more

on there own pictures and create better movies for us all! :slight_smile:

I was thinking more along the lines of, "Without DW, Aardman can

focus more on their own pictures and create even more great movies for us all."

But I guess DW focusing on their own films is also a good thing :slight_smile:

haha Dreamworks is one of those ones you kind of hope every time will pull off

something amazing, but instead they do Shark Tale XD We had a sort-of lecture thing with a Dreamworks talent

scout (she was actually our external assessor for coursework, but has left since) and she went on for aaaages

about how important story development is… and all I could think was "show me Sinbad and say that to my

face again!!" xD

And now DreamWorks is making Crood Awakening instead. If this is

true, I would expect it to be done in CG, since that’s all that DreamWorks does now really.