Buster's been neutured!

I was laughing when I saved this screenshot. Maybe its just the speed of the shot and the hair covering him up.

-Omar

Wow. I don’t think they would make his parts noticeable just so no one would say
“Oh my Jesus!! Do I see what I think I see?” But I guess we can imagine that…unless we discover Buster’s a girl!!! Than again, after Francis and Kevin, we don’t need more gender confusion.

Buster a girl? That would be awesome!

He’s just so darling. I know he’s in mid roll, but it really looks like he’s asleep on Woody. My dachshund did that to my favorite doll Jordan a lot. And on my sneakers too. -Omar :smiley:

He never had any junk in TS2, either.

Scud either. Your not going to get that in any Pixar film.

Buster’s definately a boy, though, Woody made that clear in Toy Story 2. Still, I think this topic is a tad bit silly.

Yeah, but its pretty funny. XD

And Dug in Up too. I saw his underside and nothing was there. But then again, Kyle, you’re right. Pixar don’t do that sorta thing, it’s a kid’s film!

Remy and all of the other male rats from Ratatouille are missing something really obvious too. Trust me, male rats ain’t modest. :stuck_out_tongue:

Yeeeaaaah, something makes me doubt they would animate that in a G-rated family film. :laughing:

It’s all fun and games until someone’s childhood gets ruined.

:smiley:

I was just joking around. I was going to title this Buster fell asleep on Woody, but then I saw what he was missing.

Truthfully, I haven’t seen Up, or Ratatoulle or pretty much anything other than the TS films, so I can’t really say who has what or who doesn’t.

Of course Pixar’s not going to animate That! I know that and we all know that; I just was messing around. -Omar

woah! shall i bring it up?

And then there’s all the naked monsters in [i]Monsters, Inc.[/b]… :laughing:

And Donkey in Shrek! Buster’s definitely not a girl though- it’s made really clear in Toy Story 2. Plus I don’t think Pixar would animate something like that just to prove that Buster’s a boy. I’m sure we all take Woody’s word for it.

XD It’s for the sake of it being a Universal classification, but heck, you can’t help but notice these things sometimes. In a way, as mentioned previously on the Boggs Board, I suppose some monsters would probably show some dimorphism and dichromatism, it’s just in the mammals that you should notice these, uh, ‘things’ more than other species XD.

You know, I haven’t seen this screenshot before coming onto this thread, and I know it’s abit of a ‘duh’ thing since it’s almost, what, over ten years since Toy Story 2? But, Buster’s age… can’t help but go ‘aww’ at him . :frowning:

Originally, I wanted to title this Buster Sleeping On Woody, and then I noticed his undercarriage.

DinoGirl, yes, Buster definitely makes me go awwww. :smiley: -Omar

The funny thing is, [spoil]Dug had like 60 kids.[/spoil]

Is Up’s ending still considered a spoiler?

Two reasons why animated characters don’t have genitalia:

  1. Most animated films are for kids, so I don’t think we’d want a case of ‘Crazy Frog’ or ‘Pom Poko’ here.

  2. It makes the animators’ lives easier… less parts to animate/simulate. An interesting tidbit is that the breasts of the beach girl in Knick-Knack had separate controller ‘handles’ to control their ‘bounce’… makes you wonder if they decided to include male doohickeys in cartoons, you’d require those same kind of controllers too… :wink:

Haha, Crazy Frog, I loved Crazy Frog thedriveintheatre! :laughing: Or rather, I hated it so much that I loved it. I’d forgotten all about that!

And that’s an interesting fact. :laughing: