Finding Nemo is too scary...apparently

[b]Finding Nemo too scary, Christian groups call for ratings

review[/b]

[i]NOT content with a review of television and junk food advertising

guidelines, Christian groups and children’s advocates are calling for an overhaul of children’s film content as

well as R-rated material.

Questions about the content of Finding Nemo and the Cat in the Hat and R-rated

movies have prompted the Australian Christian Lobby to approach every state government in an attempt to put film

classification guidelines on the agenda when the attorneys-general meet in March.

Lobby groups such as the

Festival of Light and the Australian Family Association are vocal critics of the film classification regime,

saying graphic sexual violence is creeping into R-rated material and being justified as artistically

meritorious.

But they have also condemned G-rated movies such as Finding Nemo for its scary violence and

the Cat in the Hat for its toilet humour and sexual innuendo.

Young Media Australia, a non-denominational

community organisation based in South Australia, is backing a review of film content focusing on the impact of

films on children’s development.

The group’s vice-president, Elizabeth Handsley, said unacceptable

levels of violence and product placement were finding their way into G-rated movies, but the boundary between PG-

and M-rated films was particularly “slippery”.

"Exposure to violence can desensitise

children to violence, can make them more accepting of it as a means of conflict resolution and if exposed to

scary violence, they can develop a mean and scary view of the world," Ms Handsley said.

"We

would like to see the guidelines made more specific and specifically connected to child development, with less

room for interpretation."

The lobby says film guidelines - reviewed in 2003 - focus on the overall

“impact” of a film or computer game and give fewer explicit directions concerning the specific

classifiable elements of sex, nudity, sexual violence, drug use and violence.

“Low-impact” drug

use and nudity is permitted in the G classification, provided it meets an overall impact test of very mild

themes.

WHAT’S WRONG WITH G?

The Cat in the Hat Rated G: Some violence and one sexual reference

when the Cat is looking at a picture of the children’s mother, who is quite attractive and wears revealing

outfits. His tail and his hat stand up straight. In one scene the Cat bends over, with a split in his fur

revealing naked buttocks.

Finding Nemo Rated G: Disturbing scenes for under-fives, including shark

attacks.

Cars Rated G: Some violence with little regard for consequences, including race crashes. Some

mild coarse language.

Over the Hedge Rated G: Scary scenes, bear threatens to kill racoon, nasty pet

traps.[/i]

Source:

smh.com.au/news/national/fin … 6/09/25/11

59036472203.html

Aww, geez. Talk about being fanatical. Interesting that

these groups have all this extra time to figure these things out. I mean, who cares if it’s rated G or PG? if

it’s animated, there’s gonna be a lot of kids there anyway…

Get a life really, they just look for stuff to moan at.

That’s what my friend said

(apart from that his speech contains loads of ‘b’ words…)

In fact some Christians find that article

offensive than the films that the article complains about…