The first article clearly states what some people will do just to spend some time posting an article that
doesn’t really need to be posted, so to speak. How can you say that a film will fail if you haven’t even seen
much of the thing yet? Yes, sometimes one can make correct assumptions about a
particular feature, but other times people are just darn wrong concerning productions that haven’t even been
given a chance yet.
The one laugh that I got out of this article is the fact that these people have no idea
what’s in store for them; they say that the film will suck. Well, let’s just see about that in June – then
they’ll be apologizing faster than you can say “dinner is served”.
Of course, I have no idea
whether or not Ratatouille will be a hit or not, but that doesn’t mean that I
don’t have any faith in the film; heck, it’s just the opposite – I can’t wait to see the thing!
By
the way, I have to stress something concerning this sentence in the article:
"…with a plot that
revolves around a rat (not the cleanest of animals)…"
Rats are not
unsanitary animals – as a matter of fact, they are quite clean! They’re probably as clean as your average house
cat… 
As for the second article: Well, I’m not gonna say anything against the guy, except for the
fact that he sure has a way with language. He should cut down on the caffeine. 
Yeah, you can’t judge
these things. Although, I do agree with the man concerning one thing: one reason
that people will go to see this movie is because it is produced by Pixar Animation Studios. That seems to put the
icing on the cake…