Luxo Jr., how it started.

So, what does everyone think of

this. I mean, I don’t think you can say you hate it, it’s just a classic.

And the sound clip from the

Pixar logo at the start, is that a specially recorded for Pixar piece, because I was watching some kids TV (

:laughing: ), and then they used that piece of instrumental music for the announcement of the winner.

I do remember someone important at Pixar (no idea who) saying about how they had a relative

with a lamp like Luxo which he played with when he was young because he imagined it as a face and body, so that

influenced him with Luxo. I think. But don’t quote me on it! :laughing: I remember seeing someone say that on an

Extras DVD, either of Toy Story 2 or Monsters, Inc., I think…

I’ve always read on the PIXAR site that Lasseter got the

inspiration from an object at his very own workstation: A Luxo lamp. Add a smaller Lamp, and a Ball. (And a

power Outlet) . . . plus a great story, and you have Luxo Jr.!

But who knows?

Maybe the kid story is true (maybe it was Lasseter, or one of his kids . . .)

I heard that too, that Lasseter had just wanted to get started on the animating,

so he took the first thing he could find good enough (a luxo) and animated it in a short. Voila.

I really like this one! I think it’s so cute how the lamps come alive and start

playing with that ball. and I felt so bad when the little one popped it!

Is that how it started? Heheh. I’ve always loved that

little short, and now I know how it all began… :wink:

Well, to be honest Mitch,

it started with another one, Adventures of Andre an Wally b. But that was under Lucasarts not Pixar.

It’s

sometimes funny to watch the cables, the physics are very poor at some points, but still cool.

Yeah, Pixar has

advanced so much since then…Ah, nostalgia! :laughing:

Ahh…I see.

Heheh – cables. Yeah, I

still enjoy the short as well, even if the technology isn’t as well “camouflaged” or detailed as their

(Pixar’s) other shorts.

It’s still amazing to think when it was made

computers were just nothing basically. :laughing:

Really? I thought that they had a good amount of technology back then – at

least, just enough to get them going. The short sure looks good for being an “oldie”, though. :wink:

I think what Luxo means is that

back in 1986 no one in the general public considered the notion that computers could be used for something fun

and meaningful, and not just for numbers, and spreadsheets, etc.

Ahh…I see. I stand corrected. :smiley:

Interesting information, by the

way…

LOL yeah, back in 1986, think about

it, IBM’s PC a newish product.