Anyone think that the first film shoulf get a rerelease? It is still the highesat grossing Harry Potter film, with Deathly Hallows behind it. This will also mark the 10th annivercy of the 1st film, being released in 2001. Should Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone be re released before Deathly Hallows part 2?
I don’t think so. If they release a movie again, that takes away the special experience of seeing it when it’s new. That, and unfortunately if they did, my sister would drag me to it. I hope they don’t.
Re-releases never show in Italy, but as far as I remember from my youth, the first Harry Potter film was made to be seen in a theatre. All the negative filters and surround sound flow perfectly in the movie (this is also true for the second, and some of the third).
If we get a rerelease, than everybody else would want a rerelease of the other 8 movies, and it’s going to be difficult to get Radcliffe to play a 11-year old when hes nearly 20!
No, they should finish the series now and let it like that for some years, so that some day someone can make a good adaptation of the awesome books. Unfortunately, to achieve that, it can’t be another movie saga, but a TV series
I guess a lot of cinemas will be doing a HP movie marathon (I know my local one is at least) where they’ll be playing all 8 movies back-to-back over one day with short breaks in between. The tickets are like $130, but a lot of people I know have already bought tickets and are planning their costumes.