[i]Author’s Note
I decided to start on some experimental writing. The plan is to write various articles, journal entries, letters, etc. and to trace story arcs through them.[/i]
fanfiction.net/s/10265590/1 … erry-Perry
An article by a guest writer laid among the files of unpublished submissions to the “Campus Roar” Opinion page. Submitted three days after the Campus Roar publication of the “Cute-Ma-Kappa” front page article, the article attracted much of the staff members’ eyes, inspiring them to jeering snickers, uneasy chuckles, silent guilt, or just mere apathy.
A majority of the staff deemed it unsuitable for publication for reasons best left to private conjecture.
Opinion Page Entry: “On Competition”
[i]I caution readers of the pessimism ahead. I would ask you to forgive it, but I cannot, especially, when M.U. has constantly justified this pessimism.
The monster culture is defined by Scaring. What drives it? Competition. As a competitor of this year’s Scare Games myself, I have experienced its pros and cons of competition.
Competitive drives can be fun and handy. It teaches discipline and competency in situations of great pressure. Competition does encourage productive work. It is no coincidence that many veterans of the Scare Games, winners and losers alike, would attain successful careers in Scaring.
But there is an overlooked guideline. The Scare Games are designed “as a friendly competition,” as its founder, Dean Hardscrabble, puts it. And I doubt the definition of “friendly” would involve brutally hazing other competitors. The incident at the Roar Omega Roar (ROR) fraternity party is evidence of this. My team has unfortunately have subjected to an onslaught of ridicule from competitors, but the “Cute-Ma-Kappa” incident was the height of the insults. I have grown to expect ridicule, as Oozma Kappa is admittedly not known for its prestige and we are striving to earn respect from the school. After the incident, I cannot be silent if it means watching my brothers suffer for other monsters’ pettiness.
Even if the school board cared to investigate the circumstances of the prank, I have the feeling that it would not change the insensitive stance of campus students, who kept purchasing those photos for their amusement and passing them around as a fad. ROR masqueraded their bullying into a “benevolent” charity drive to pass the radar of school authorities, as if our shame was part of some higher cause and amusement of the monster culture. They escaped consequences simply because of the premeditated measures they took not be penalized. They have done this before and will do this again.
I will try my hand at understanding it. I speculate that it has something to do with competition. Could it be the fear of losing? Possibly, as every competitor, especially ROR, have positions to keep up. Their dignity is at stake. The fear of losing is natural (but also irrational if you take it too far).
But what I fail to comprehend is that ROR has reason to believe that they cannot lose. They have no reason to flaunt their sense of predetermined victory. They hold the record of most Scare Game wins, known for their lineage to legendary Scarers, and a majority of ROR members are A-Honor roll students. But do not let these particular compliments indicate that they are strong in character. These monsters belittle others because they believe it asserts their superiority. Winning or being close to winning was not enough for them so they make others, namely the “losers,” suffer for their petty dissatisfaction.
I cannot decide which is more appalling. To see fellow competitors take it out on the “losers” and treat them like jokes rather than offer legit constructive criticism. Or the fact that spectators and bystanders laugh with the “joke” instead of intervening, which would perpetuate more of this heinous behavior in future Games. If M.U. celebrates this bullying, then what are we? Is this the consequences of competition?
Competition serves as a useful exercise in competency and skills. But it should not be treated as an assertion of egoism, especially when it is at the expense of others. I do not ask for sympathy, but I would appreciate some sensitivity. If you are so invested in the faults and self-esteem of others, try helping them instead of bullying them? Who are you to decide who others’ “faults” are? Who are you to decide how others’ should react to their own faults? Want to criticize other competitors? Be constructive, not destructive. And “constructive” certainly does not involve relentless teasing and belittling. It involves a sincere concern for the work and efforts of others to enhance and improve the work and efforts of others, not to degrade it.
Privileges and victories are there to earn, not abuse.
Guest writer and proud Oozma Kappa brother,
Terry Perry.[/i]
Unlike other rejected guest articles, it laid among the “Campus Roar” archives, neither to be published nor disposed of.