[i]A/N
Any criticism is welcomed for this story I wrote. And it does not have to be constructive. The prologue is coming.[/i]
The Intro
In doubt, there is absurdity. In absurdity, there is certainty. Absurdity should never be taken for granted.
Witnesses were thrown off by the sight of unfamiliarity. The shallow witnesses withdraw to search of amusement to feed their desires and indulgences. Witnesses leave quietly never realizing that their incomprehension was anticipated.
So logic would agree that certainty is doubt.
Witnesses were thrown off by the inconsistencies and repetition. The uptight witnesses take for granted the possibility that “errors” are present for reasons. They cannot decide whether to laugh or scoff. They criticize to feed their own malice; they do not criticize for the welfare of others’ mentality. They laugh at the attempt at profundity. Witnesses withdrew after blatantly deriding their victim. If they realize that their scorn was anticipated, they continue deriding.
The rambling ambiguity, the dissonance, and the repetition will torment them. The rambling ambiguity, the dissonance, and the repetition will allow her to survive. The rambling ambiguity, the dissonance, and the repetition can be manipulated for them to live blissfully. If witnesses can patiently recognize the rambling ambiguity, dissonance, and repetition, then it is possible for witnesses to be patient with their story.