Just making a post for what you think. 
Any opnions? What would you want to see
if it ever happened? Should it happen?
I would like to see a MI2, so yea Pixar should go for
it!
An MI2, for me,
would be like all of my Christmasses/Birthdays coming at once. It’s something that I wish for every
day.
Mainly because I’d like to see Randall return and develop more, with a slow arc into becoming a
better natured person and learning from his mistakes (but a SLOW arc, mind you, not a BOOF 'okay I’m a good guy
now’ kind of thing, because that would just be unreasonable.)
Anyway, the end of MI does hint towards a
sequel, and I’m pretty curious to see how Sulley handles being CEO. Also, seeing Boo at a slightly older age
would be interesting.
Thinkin the same thing LG Seeing Boo older is the same with Jack-Jack, having her
able to talk would really give us a chance to know her personality better.
Definitely,
because although she was such an adorable child, and Pixar handled such a character very well, there’s still
something slightly 2D about her. Pixar did give her a lot of personality, but it could be expanded even more with
her being able to speak.
Any story ideas for the sequel?
Not really, just whatever Pixar wants to do.
Yes. But not any that are even relatively plausible. 
No
problem, I don’t mind hearing em anyway but if you don’t wanna tell it’s aight
A sequel would be
cool.
I’ve said this on BB- I’d like to see Randall in a sequel as long as he’s not a labeled 'bad
guy’. ^^ If not, I’d rather not see him in it at all, for his sake.
A sequel for Monsters, Inc. would be
interesting to say the most. I guess the end Monsters, Inc. hints for a sequel because you don’t get to see Boo,
but truth be told, I would rather have a new film with new characters.
That would be interesting. But
again, i’m not sure what they’d do with it. (But I’m never really sure. I can never think "Oh yeah, this
storyline would make a great sequel" cuz I just dont think that way I guess) I’d kinda rather see a new
movie if I had the choice between the 2.
The end of Monsters Inc was so beautiful and great! They would destroy this end,
if the would do a sequel with the same characters. But I’d like to see a Monster-movie from this created world,
but with new characters. Like they would do it with a whole new movie.
That’d be quite
interesting, actually…Would they ever do that, though? I mean, maybe not any time soon, but in the future,
it’s a possibility.
I have to disagree there. The end of “Monsters, Inc.” left a LOT
“up in the air”. We do not know how long Sulley can continue to visit Boo, without getting caught, we
do not know what exactly happened to Mr. Waternoose, who could very well have beat the rap and got off
Scott-free, following his trial, and who could cause some real trouble for Sulley if he did. We do not know what
happened to Randall-if he survived, and if he did, whether he can make it back to the Monster World. With the
exception of “The Incredibles”, no other Pixar movie needs a sequel moreso than "Monsters,
Inc."
pitbulllady
Those questions aren’t very important , I think. All
those things are only important, if the WOULD do one. But there is no sign in the movie, that Waternoose can
escape or Sulley gets in trouble.
Your thoughts are like, when you would’ve said to A bug’s Life end: But
maybe Hopper kills Flik after the end??
No questions for me.
It is VERY much "a
question" to the many fans of Randall Boggs, who has a large and devoted following, in case that point has
gone by you from earlier posts. I also did not say that Waternoose could “escape”, but that like many
rich individuals(and time and experience has proven this to be true in many cases here in OUR world, at least)he
could hire a top-notch legal team and get out all most, if not all, charges against him. After all, the video
taped evidence was made without his knowledge, and he was led into confessing his intent to "kidnap 1,000
children", etc., which could very well constitute entrapment. Furthermore, a key witness who could turn
State’s Evidence against him, his own pawn in this whole plot, has “mysteriously” disappeared, so that
key witness will not be able to testify. A judge could very well dismiss the video tape, and then what would the
prosecution have? Not much, not enough for a solid conviction, anyway. Like many high-profile defendants here
in the Human World(which seems to closely parallel the Monster World of M.I.), Waternoose could simply go free,
cleared of all charges.
AND, as I stated, there are MANY of us who would like to see Randall return and
get a second chance. I’m firmly with John Lasseter in his belief that Pixar’s movies do not need
“villains”, and it’s much stronger to show a character arc than the old Saturday morning kiddie show
“Good Guy Beats Up Bad Guy” garbage. Kids need to know and understand that people can and do change
for the better, and that no one is purely good or purely evil, and seeing a character undergo a gradual change
from “bad” to “good” is a convincing way to get that point across, and is a much more
INTELLIGENT point than “Good Guys Beats Up Bad Guy”.
pitbulllady
Sorry G but I gotta agree wit PBL there.
[/quote]
I
agree with Groaning. As much as I will probably love a 'Monsters, Inc. 2" (because IF PIXAR does it, then
it’ll be great), right now, I just don’t want to see one. Sure a lot can be seen as "left in the
air," but it really is an epic and complete film. Randall gets banished and banged in the head in the
bayou. I really like how he ends up, especially with what he tried to do to Boo earlier . . . and if a MI2 were
ever to come out, I’m thinking a new baddie would rise instead anyways (ala Al & Stinky Pete in TS2 instead
of a return of Sid).
But that’s of course if there really is such thing as baddies in PIXAR. Oh wait,
Hopper . . .
[/quote]
So we’re back to the
"Randall deserves to be brutally beaten to death for his part, but Waternoose only deserves to go to jail
and have three meals a day and a roof over his head for PLANNING the whole thing and ORDERING Randall to do
whatever it was everyone THINKS he did because Randall is scaly and reptilian and Waternoose isn’t", along
with the "Mike and Sulley are heroes who SHOULD have acted as vigilantes and taken the law into their own
hands because the guy they did it to is evil because he’s reptilian and they aren’t" bit, I
see.
WHAT, exactly, did Randall “do to Boo”? He never hurt her, not once. He never even YELLED
at her, which is more than I can say for dear, sweet Mike. It was NOT his idea to kidnap children and test them
in the Scream Extractor, nor could he have been expected to have much sympathy for HUMAN children in the first
place. Human children were believed to be dangerous, uncivilized and nothing more than "lower
animals", after all. Boo would NOT have been held in equal regards to a monster child, by a long stretch,
simply because the monsters had very little knowledge of human children, other than the wive’s tales and urban
legends. It is stupid to assume that Randall, or any other monster, would have much sympathy for such a
“dangerous” creature, without having had the time to find out the truth. It is just as stupid to assume
that any given monster SHOULD feel the same way about a human child, automatically, as they would a monster
child. Everyone goes on and on about “what Randall wanted to do to Boo”, but totally(and
conveniently)forgets that MIKE wanted to do some really awful things to her, too, like abandon her in the wild,
or in an unknown human house in another part of the world, or launch her out of the city with a giant catapult.
They also VERY conveniently forget that the horrible Randall Boggs actually keeps her from falling to her death
in the Door Vault, even though he had been ordered by that point to kill her. Randall’s attitude towards a
human child was no different from that of 99.999% of the monsters in his world, though it probably was a bit
BETTER, since he, unlike most of his contemporaries, at least did not believe that Boo deserved death simply
because of what she was. If he did, he would have killed her there in the Door Vault, as he’d been ordered to
do, instead of SAVING her from death! Oh, and let’s not forget that the CDA also wanted her dead, yet THEY
aren’t labeled “evil” or “bad guys”. Gee, I wonder why?
pitbulllady