Alongside the IGN review of the re-release of Sonic Adventure on Xbox Live Arcade, that was easily the worst review done by someone who is supposed to be a professional that I have seen this year.
I wonder what did armond feel when he noticed that toy story was the king in the box office 
I’m pretty sure if they say they dont’ like it, they don’t like it.
If Satan likes Toy Story, does that mean he likes other Pixar movies? 
You know, maybe someone should make a petition for people to sign if they think he’s an (soz for the language) *sshole, a D*****bag, etc. Then we could email it to him and laugh at his face!
I wish I knew his e-mail address, so that I could tell him what I think of him…
And Chuckles, have you still got that essay you wrote on him? I’d love to see it!
Maybe there’s a profile on Rt and his email adress is there. If not there’s gotta be some way to at least comment on something, right?
I looked, and I couldn’t find it. If I had a Rotton Tomatoes account, I’d comment and tell him my displeasure.
Also, Lee Unkrich responded to the Armond and Cole’s negative criticism on his Twitter profile with this:
“You are sad, strange little men, and you have my pity.”
For anyone else, it would sound egotistic, but seriously, even he knows when he’s made a masterpiece, and people are being contrarians just for the heck of it.
Come to think of it, a contrarian critic is an oxymoron. Why would I want to know some dude’s opinion if it’s just the opposite of what the popular one is? For people wanting to rent a movie that they know little about, his reviews are pretty much useless.
Lol, that sounds like a great comment.
You couldn’t have said it better. I think it’s pretty obvious by now that Mr White isn’t a critic you should listen to.
As much as I disagree with White’s opinions, I dont’ think it would be right to harrass him for using his right to free speech.
He shouldn’t be harassed for disagreeing, he should be harassed for being an incompetent reviewer.
But he gets more than enough of that, I doubt he even reads his hate mail. even if does, it probably just strokes his ego.
I disagree (for the first part). He normally has no logic to base his contradictions off of, and that’s where I draw the line.
The review itself is just so much of a joke that I seriously think it could be a Mad Libs, in fact, it would be funny to replace a couple words, and make it into a review of a different movie. Actually, I might demonstrate what his review of The Shawshank Redemption would look like…
Pixar > Armond White
Pixar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Armond White
Good one. How about this?
Pixar > An idiot > Toilet paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Armond White
Haha good one
Well, that’s the thing. He has free speech, and so do we. To quote Linkara of Atop the Fourth Wall:
“Now, I’m a capitalist, so he’s free to publish whatever the h*** he wants. But on that same note, I’m free to criticize the h*** out of him for doing so.”
Maybe
Pixar> An idiot > Toilet paper > The C**p on the toilet aper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Armond White Lol