and I am also so thrilled because Disney*Pixar is creating BRAVE Official Facebook Pages for every territory World Wide
so far there are
Brave France
Brave Deutschland
Brave UK and Ireland
Brave Australia & New Zealand
Brave España
Brave Italia
Brave Malaysia
Brave Philippines
Brave Singapore
Brave USA
Merida and the Queen are obvious, but who is that humongous-size man? Doesn’t look like a king to me. Can he be one of the three lords mentioned today? What about the triplets? Is there any chance they’re the three lords??? (outlandish, I know, but still, worth hypothesizing…)
According to the articles, there are three lord, one of which is “the enormous Lord MacGuffin”. That must be him. He (or maybe the three) might be antagonists. Or at least have the type.
We actuale had a debate about that in another board, I think the Cars 2 one, and that’s one possibility, but I doubt it. First, because that would be more of a parody move, as pizza didn’t exist on that time, and this looks like a very serious movie.
Second, we’ve always got the PP truck on it’s original form. I would put it exactly like it is, but so tiny it’s very difficult to spot for a casual viewer, avoiding the anachronism questions among the audience.
“To further clarify, characters from say Rio, Toy Story 3, Despicable Me and Kung Fu Panda look and act ‘childish’ in the sense that they have bright colour palettes and are prone to exaggerated movements. Characters from say, Akira, Rango, Legend of the Guardians, and Secret of the N.I.M.H. are more reserved and ‘matured’ in the way they act and look.”
That’s the silliest thing I’ve ever read. Especially in regards to that Owl movie and the juvenile rango. Toy Story is far more mature in it’s themes and acting than any of the so called “mature” films you mention. Same goes for Toy Story 2 & 3, and Ratatouille, and Wall-e and Finding Nemo. Only those had great stories and great storytelling as well.
He was mainly referring to the way that they are designed and how they move, not the overall themes, and in that case he has a point. Just look at, say, the bathroom scene in TS3. Very exaggerated expressions and movements that would look out of place in the other movies he listed, although that’s not to say that the others don’t have intimate moments. No need to get personal about it.
Wow, looks good. This will really spark my interest up much more than Cars 2, which is not creating alot of interest to me, even though I liked the first one
Please read my post again. It appears you have misunderstood it. For the record, I think Rango is not a very ‘kid-friendly’ movie, and the ‘Owl movie’ has a proper name. And calling someone’s opinion “silly” isn’t very matured, bud.
.
Thanks for the clarification Bryko, that’s exactly what I meant. To anyone else who’s misinterpreted me, just compare the character animation from Toy Story with say, Grave of the Fireflies. The former feels like a ‘cartoon’ (although like Bryko said, there are more intimate and ‘grown-up’ pensive moments) while the latter feels like a live-action movie. Once again, I’m speaking with respect to the character design and the animation, not the themes.
Wow, they’re really pulling out all the stops here!
Anyway, great observation on the figure in the first picture, I didn’t notice it! I think it looks like a giant owl, but then again it could be a wombat or something.
I wonder whether the title 'Brave ’ is an adjective like ‘Tangled’, or a noun like ‘Mulan’ (in the sense that the heroine’s nickname will become ‘Brave’ by the end of the movie or something).
rango was made for 7 year olds in mind. There’s nothing “adult” about it–it’s one of the most purile, juvenile and unimaginative cartoons ever made. And that owl movie was even worse than sucker punch or watchman (both awful things). Almost makes that childish pablum secret of nimh palatable. Almost.
and rango was ugly.
The Toy Story movies deal with abandonment, death, and much more mature, adult issues, and handle them in far more adult and imaginative ways. Actually, MOST of Pixar’s films do this. Only Cars and maybe A Bug’s Life were made more for kids in mind.
[quote:2yh8t9f0]rango was made for 7 year olds in mind. There’s nothing "adult" about it–it’s one of the most purile, juvenile and unimaginative cartoons ever made. And that owl movie was even worse than sucker punch or watchman (both awful things). Almost makes that childish pablum secret of nimh palatable. Almost.
and rango was ugly.[/quote:2yh8t9f0]
Aside from the fact that your criticisms are from constructive, employ a lot of hyperbole ("most", "ever made", etc.) and have no explanation whatsoever (which scenes are juvenile, what exactly do you mean by worse, why do you say such and such is like pablum, etc.), I’m sure that you’d be surprising a lot of members here when you say things like Secret of the NIMH is "childish" or, that Rango is "purile".