To
Dash:
I do see that your knowledge in these kinds of things of Pixar is quite
well-off. But am not wanting to be changed on my thoughts about what I believe in already about this
subject.
Personally, I do know you are a true Pixar fan. But only because you
say you are and not one of Brad Bird, definitely does Not mean Bird isnt a symbol to
you in your identity of being a Pixar fan. The evidence is already there in the state that your support for Bird
in many places of your statement is considerably high than that of the other Pixar Leaders single-file.
But I
dont say that is a bad thing at all Dash. You have your faith in Pixar and these people. So do keep that faith
going if you want to see what you believe in over there, happen or continue to happen in the future to
come.
My statement in going beyond the limits is something that I do agree for many companies themselves.
Pixar attempting to stand out from all other Animation companies is something I do not mind about. But having a
person in the company trying to increase the speed of this term in attempt for a dramatic one, would either lead
to a stand-out (With fall downs here and there and some possibly major) or a complete fall down from where it
began from, which would bring the company into alot of disaster.
I do know change is good. But out of all
my experiences of it (And not saying by what I think about it), Too much of it can change the phase of someone or
something to a negative sign.
I wouldn’t believe that everyone here on this community would want Pixar to be
changing rapidly and continously in the state of the face of this company. Its need to be a gradual process of
brainstorming, etc.
Pixar can go beyond the limits. But if it does it by following that of other companies
ways, than I dont believe going beyond the limits would help it survive.
See, I do not take Pixar together
with Disney, as I never had and never will. Pixar is one Studio company that has never originated or has ever
been made from Disney. Only because now they are Inc. with Disney, does Not mean it needs to be treated as of
Disney.
I still dont know if this site would have still been made even if the deal for Pixar becoming part of
Disney was not passed.
But belief in knowing that Disney’s way is great for Pixar’s is not the thing to
assume automatically only because it made Disney “great” in the previous century as you said. Know that
things in the realm of Pixar Can be different itself,
Not Disney/Pixar or the “culture” of it no matter if the feature movie productions were made under a
thing Disney/Pixar and especially The Incredibles since you said that was what made
you enter the Pixar craze and so forth.
But again as stated, I dont see Pixar as
of Disney or in part of it, and also because it never came from it as well in the beginning.
Now in terms
of your faith with The leaders of Pixar, I hope you will continue to believe in them for as long as this part can
be in the future time of your life to come. But even if Pixar does respond negatively to like that of what said
of the faith you have for them, you shouldn’t stop there. Like I said they have
made many errors before. But I know they have learned from them, and in return they can learn from that of what
you say would tell you to stop believing in the culture part of Pixar.
Lastly, as a true expert on the
individual Dory, and a person who has learned the basis of the movie that this character pertains to,
Finding
Nemo is Not an actual “Underwater” CGI film. The animators and graphics creators used an
illusion to make the movie appear as If, it was something to be thought that it was
underwater to the audience by using sorts of particle and lighting elements to create that particular
illusion.
I have something for you to know about what it really means to have these productions of Pixar
created. Looking from a quote that I had seen from Andrew Stanton with Lee Unkrich in an interview dating 2-4
years ago. He says that on the production of his first main work in Pixar, the animation used to produce his
thought to us about Finding Nemo is an asset to the
story. There is alot of meaning to that word that he stated, only as there is for what John Lasseter stated to
remind you that in order to produce an animated movie, there needs to be these three elements:
world, character, and story.
