Votre Critique de Ratatouille

Well, I suppose I should finally put my review up.

Brad Bird’s latest film, Ratatouille, is a tasty treat with a well cooked story and deliciously flavorful animation that people both young and old will eat up from start to “fin.” He has shown once again that he can cook by preparing yet another superb adventure for the silver screen. Like both of Bird’s prior films, The Incredibles and The Iron Giant, there is really no way to focus on any one aspect that makes the picture great, but instead, it is a culmination of the many ingredients that lead to a tasteful finale and perfect balance of humor, drama, action, and heart.

Any hard working animator at Pixar, the company that gave us both Toy Story movies and Finding Nemo will tell you that “story is king.” If so then Ratatouille will stay fresh for a long time to come as Bird seals yet another script air tight with no holes left unplugged. As usual, the “tail” comes full arc, not only outlining a beefy plot in which a rat (Remy) chases his dream of becoming a great chef in what was once Paris’ greatest restaurant (Gusteau’s), but also explaining the unbelievable and leaving nothing swept under the rug. Best of all, it relies on none of the toilet humor and pop-culture references that carry so many animated films today, but isn’t above the occasional jab (“Cheney” brand shotgun ammo) or subtle humor (“tiny chef”) that Pixar is famous for. He gives just enough back-story to bring the characters to life and animate them with unique and fitting personalities but leaves plenty of room for imagination on all levels. All of this is accomplished with acute timing so precise that the films flow is entirely uninterrupted as it bounces back and forth between touching scenes of the human spirit, the fast paced choreography of the kitchen, and a slap-stick comedy of proportion reminiscent of the Three Stooges or the great physical talents of Vaudeville lore.

In the near flawless execution of such maneuverings though reminds one that it is nearly impossible to go to a Pixar film without becoming lost in the animation. Yet it seems more and more the animation itself is becoming lost. Panoramic scenes, aided by the impressive height of garbage boy Linguini and lack there of by “little chef” rat Remy who frequently interact in big ways, leave a lot of free space to display scenery that is near perfect in every detail. Every shimmer of light, texture of surface, and piece of food that looks not only edible but scrumptious, is rendered with near photo-realistic qualities to an extent tempting to accuse them of being live action and not animated at all. However, the stylization of humans, cars, and various fanciful expressions brings it back to its pixel roots and instills the charm that can only be garnered by drawn art. Bird also takes full advantage of the CGI world and realizes its capabilities to an extent unprecedented in the medium and unattainable in any other through the use of the invisible and movable camera to capture moving images that would make the most experienced cinematographer’s jaw drop.

Scenes filmed pulling back through a pack of rats or scurrying through the inside of a wall also make the ideal fodder for yet another impressive score by Michael Giacchino (Alias and [i]Lost[/]). If he hadn’t already proven himself with the skilled shrills of brass in the Jazz Band from his soundtrack for The Incredibles then he certainly did this time. Academy members this year will be hard pressed not to recognize the equal mastery of woodwinds and strings displayed for Ratatouille. The movie’s reoccurring theme continuously comes to life with new “Frenchy” underscores in each scene, and lends well to the frequent scampers and action sequences as well as the film’s more dramatic and romantic (this is Paris after all) elements. Camille’s added vocals (a rarity for a Bird film) in the time elapsed montage, augments the score drawing upon pre-established themes and maintaining the preset atmosphere (I only wish I knew what those lyrics were saying).

Vocally, Bird stands by his time-honored tradition of casting the right voices, not just the most famous ones. In fact, two of the strongest characters find their voice in Pixar’s very own talent pool. Linguini, the hapless garbage boy and Remy’s brother Emile are voiced by company animators Lou Romano and Peter Sohn respectively. While drawing from the inside is common at Pixar, it’s not as frequent for major, leading roles. Despite not being big names though, both seem to be a precise fit for their characters and become the role rather than it becoming them as often occurs with big ticket names. More known names such as Janeane Garofalo (hard-hitting cook and Linguini’s love interest, Colette), Brad Garret (phantom chef and restaurant great, Auguste Gusteau), Pixar good luck charm John Ratzenburger (waiter Mustafa), and Patton Oswald (Remy) also add spice to Ratatouille’s more interesting players. Oswald’s sincere tone and enthusiastic determination set the pace for the film and Remy’s character making him both heart wrenching and endearing simultaneously. It should also be noted that Bird, who is no stranger to voice acting himself (the voice of Edna “E” Mode in The Incredibles and Ambrister Minion in Ratatouille),is very clever in coaching his voices to handle the “French accent” problem that automatically arises with a Parisian set film marketed to a Yankee audience. While there is a “consistent Frenchiness,” as he calls it, to the accents, there is a clear distinction in its use. The accent is a trademark of the snootier people on the inside, while outsiders like Linguini and the rats (who coincidentally get most of the lines anyway) have a far more American inflection. Bird also gets creative with the accent for argumentative scenes in which it’s not so important what’s being said as long as it’s being said passionately, a tool which he favors in all of his films. It would be unfair however to let this paragraph pass without mentioning at least one other item. While less famous talents were well suited for the aforementioned roles, ironically it was the movie’s one major star, Peter O’Toole, the voice of harsh food critic Anton Ego, that sets the bar. O’Toole delivers what may very well be the finest monologue in animated film history near the movie’s close as he delves into his own discoveries and the story’s moral. He is undoubtedly the finest antagonist since Tony Jay’s Judge Frollo in The Hunchback of Notre Dame but delivers a surprisingly rounded and fully developed character that I fully expect to be rewarded with an Annie. If the Academy were ever to consider a voice artist for Best Supporting Actor, this would certainly be the time to do it.

Pixar and Brad Bird have a new classic. If the thought of rats in the kitchen, cooking food at a gourmet restaurant is a turn off, then this movie of opposites will be an equally astounding turn on. The revealingly deep story appeals on every level from it’s light hearted surface fluff of doing the impossible, to its enduring tale of “accomplishing your seemingly improbable dream,” to the underlying criticism of well… critics and the entire animation industry. It will capture the hearts of adults and the attention of children and shouldn’t be underestimated by either in terms of wit and enjoyment. Ratatouille is the perfect recipe for every “foody” and film junky out there.

Dash - My thoughts exactly, sir. Beautifully stated, Dash. I’m with you on every one of those finely addressed statements. Wonderful review! :wink:

Well if you wanna practise your french, you can read my critique :sunglasses:

Dash, I love your review! It really focuses on what makes Ratatouille a new classic.

Kinoo, I wish I knew French.

Kinoo: Could you provide a translation please? :stuck_out_tongue:

Yeah, it’d be nice to know what you said! :stuck_out_tongue:

Dash, your review is top notch. :smiley: You cover every important aspect of the film, and you know how envious I am of your writing skills. :wink:

~~=oP

Kinoo - Oh, how I wish I could read French. I take it that you enjoyed the film, though! Heheh. :wink:

PV - Aww – writing is easy! Just practice and have fun doing it! Your writing skills sure seem fine to me, actually. :smiley:

Get ready for a post-fest. Heheheheh. :wink:

Went to see it for the second time yesterday. What surprised me is that pretty much the whole parking lot was filled. Not what you’d expect on the 4th of July. When I walked in, I noticed something that was very odd to me: [spoil]It was one of the smaller theaters. That seemed half odd, half true because the film just went into wide release, and yet, Transformers and Lisence to Wed just opened up.[/spoil]

The film was as good as ever. This time everyone was laughing (during Lifted especially, but that’s a no-brainer) , but during different sections of the film. Not that I’m surprised at all by this, everyone’s sense of humor is different. One thing that I just couldn’t get over was at the very begining of the film: [spoil]When we first see Remy and he explains to the audience about the situation that he’s in. The animation of the various rats throughout that scene really impressed me beyond belief. Especially when all the rats crawl through the crate, the rendering and simulation of the fur was so realistic I couldn’t believe my eyes.[/spoil]

The voice-acting is good as always. Pixar always cast the right people as the voices and this film was no exception. Patton Oswalt stole the show as Remy, what more can I say? Peter Sohn as Emile: Brilliant. He did a excellent job with that character. He made Emile into this witty, funny, husky character (from my point of view) that made it very enjoyable.
Lou Romano, again, what more can I say? He absolutely nailed Linguini to the point where I was smiling just from the delivery of the lines. Here’s an example: [spoil] When he goes into the vegetable storage room and tears off his shirt and sees all those bite marks and scratches, the delivery of those three screams (each one became louder and more extreme) made me laugh on the inside so hard. [/spoil]
Peter O’Toole as Anton Ego, he was perfect for the character to the point where as soon as Ego delivered his first lines at the very begining, I knew that there was nobody else who couldv’e done this better than he did. The delivery of all of Ego’s lines were unbelievable. The timing, everything. The design seems Peter O’Toole - esque to me ( Jan Pinkava mentioned that the design of Ego was based on a vulture and that’s apparent as well)
Will Arnett as Horst: He did an amazingly funny job with the character. That was apparent right away. What more can I possibly say?
Ian Holm as Skinner: Man, what a great performance. Now, I only know Ian from seeing him in The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Based on that, I had absolutely no idea at all what to expect when I walked in the theater for the first time at the sneak preview on June 16, and this time as well. The accent for Skinner is so well done and once again, the delivery is perfect. He really captured Skinner’s sudden anger and took him to the next level.

The production design was phenominal. Harley Jessup (one of the production designers on Monsters, Inc. ) did an unbelievable job with the sets. If there’s an Academy Award for Production Design, Harley is the person to give it to. The design of the dining section of Gusteau’s restaurant is so eye-catching and dead on that I can’t even describe it.
Even the designs of the sewers were amazing to me.

As I said in my first review, thank you to John Lasseter, Brad Bird, Andrew Stanton, Brad Lewis, Mark Andrews, Jan Pinkava and the entire cast and crew for creating such a masterpiece of animated filmaking.

Bill - Awesome review, Bill. I quite enjoyed reading it. :wink:

To add onto that:

[spoil]I was impressed by this as well – the fur simulation is absolutely astounding to every degree. However, what really caught my eye was the effect water had on the rats’ fur; the way rain was integrated into the hair (even seemingly unimportant droplets, such as those that dripped onto Remy’s head as he made his way down the sewer passage) was siimply phenominal. There is something so…“flavorful” – so “tasty” – …about that little tidbit of animation that just strikes me as ingenious. I’ve heard that water is much easier to animate now then it used to be, but man… I mean, just look at it! It’s incredible! I swear I could have reached out and touched the water, let alone the rats themselves. Astounding…[/spoil]

Absolutely…astounding. I’ve gotta work at Pixar…

– Mitch

Mitch, you’ve seen the Ratatouille trailer 92 times? :open_mouth:

The animation in this film was astounding. I loved scenes where the whole rat colony was running… just that mass of rats moving across the ground; they looked like a single, furry, moving unit. :smiley: Those sequences amazed me.

BandGeek - I’m glad you liked the movie! :wink:

Yeah, it’s pretty pitiful. (snigger) :laughing:

Fur rendering + water effects = death by animation. x.X
Believe me, I’ve tried it.

I’m pretty proud of how Pixar handled such effects this time around. Every time they get a little better. I shall never forget how memorized I was by Sully’s fur and Vi’s hair. I’d love to get my greedy little paws on whatever program they’ve been using. :unamused:

Well, I went to see the film again for the ninth time yesterday. Wow. That’s all I can say. Wow… I notice something different every single time I attend a screening of the film, and that particular time left me with a revelation – a factual statement that was worth my while…

I couldn’t think of a better way to have spent my crazy Saturday than to have gone to indulge in a bowl of Ratatouille

<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/love2.gif" alt=":loves:" title="In <p>Love" /></p>

Mitch: You should have a counter in your signature of how many times you have seen Ratatouille.

rachel - Ha! I was thinking of doing that, but I thought I would look like too big of a “show-off” if I did. Then again, I’m “showing off” pretty hard when taking into consideration the number of times I’ve seen the trailer. Heheh. :laughing:

That’s not really showing off. Yeah, everyone knows already that you see Ratatouille practically every day so… :wink:

Finally saw the film today. Funny enough I wasn’t actually expecting to see it.
Originally me, my mom, and R…me and my mom heh…went to see Harry Potter, having been continual fans of the movie and appreciators of the franchise.
However…the movie lost it’s audio for about 30 minutes -_-, though they managed to fix it at the beginning of the movie.
Surprisingly, we were disappointed. It was as if the “flow” we’ve followed in past Harry Potter movies wasn’t there. The movie itself kept winding you to different places leaving you with a “heuh?”.
Anyway, the reason I talk about Harry Potter here, is because to compare it. It is to be seen as MAJOR competition to Ratatouille.
In a fit of deciding what to do, my mom surprisingly offered to see Ratatouille. We got our tickets and had to wait fo the next show (HOWEVER…in this time, I managed to win an Emile plush from one of the games. He’ll go quite nicely with the Remy I won last time seeing Transformers heh, that’s my skill).
After seeing it, we both agreed. Ratatouille was MUCH better. The story flowed so well. The attention to detail and the pure switch motion and inventivness of action was down to a point. Not to mention the arrange of emotions, especially for Remy himself, were amazing.
I particually give kudos to the scenes with water, especially the raining scene(no spoiler). I may not be as surprised as you guys, as I was expecting it to be as such a great film.
I particularly like Remy’s struggle between his dream and his family, proving to make the story of “A Rat who wants to be a chef” all that more entertainable. Overall, I give it a 10/10, a landmark in achievement for both story and animation.
Now brushes off coat I’ll give my review to Remy and possibly Django and Emile. Till then.

I just realized I havent put in my two cents about this movie yet! I’m afraid it’s not gonna be very long or detailed, because I’m not that articulate. Well, I’ve seen it 3 times. I’d probably put it 5th or 6th on my list (sorry Mitch). Overall I personally would probably give it a B+. Dont get me wrong! I did enjoy it (or why else would I have gone to see it 3 times?) and I do think it’s a good movie. There were bits that made me laugh out loud, and bits that I thought were really heartfelt. I enjoyed the story. I liked the characters of Linguini, and Colette, and actually Anton Ego. (I think it’s because he’s a Brit, and I like British. ) I like the fact that there’s a strong female character in the movie. I never thought the movie dragged or got tiresome or anything. But I dont know what it was about it that I just didnt get into it. I only know that because with Cars (and with Nemo too), I needed it. I needed to see it at every possible chance. I craved it like most people crave air. But with Ratatouille, I’m just not feeling that. Which is okay. I dont have to adore everything they do. I’m just trying to give my honest opinion here. Please dont hate me, or find out where I live and come and TP my house! :wink:

rachel - Haha. Well, I’ll probably wait until I’ve seen the trailer a hundred times and then I’ll start to count how many times I’ve seen the film itself. How’s that? :wink:

Nexas and lennonluvr9 - I’m glad you guys liked it!

Heheh. None taken. Everybody has different tastes (no pun intended)! :wink: