Performance
Targeting
Unclassified
Targeting cookies are used to identify visitors between different websites, eg. content partners, banner networks. Those cookies may be used by companies to build a profile of visitor interests or show relevant ads on other websites.
Cookie report
|
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
| __gads |
.pixarplanet.com |
1 year |
This cookie is associated with the DoubleClick for Publishers service from Google. Its purpose is to do with the showing of adverts on the site, for which the owner may earn some revenue. |
| IDE |
.doubleclick.net |
1 year |
This cookie carries out information about how the end user uses the website and any advertising that the end user may have seen before visiting the said website. |
| DSID |
.doubleclick.net |
1 hour |
This cookie is set to note your specific user identity. It contains a hashed/encrypted unique ID. |
| KTPCACOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
1 day |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
| mc |
.quantserve.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie is usually provided by Quantserve to track anonymous information about how website visitors use the site. |
| KADUSERCOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
3 months |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
| CMID |
.casalemedia.com |
1 year |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
| CMPS |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
| CMPRO |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
| na_tc |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
| uid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie provides a uniquely assigned, machine-generated user ID and gathers data about activity on the website. This data may be sent to a 3rd party for analysis and reporting. |
| ouid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
| rlas3 |
.rlcdn.com |
1 year |
This cookie is generally provided by rlcdn.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
| uuid |
.innovid.com |
3 months |
This cookie is used to optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites – this exchange of visitor data is normally provided by a third-party data-center or ad-exchange. |
Unclassified cookies are cookies that do not belong to any other category or are in the process of categorization.
Cookie report
|
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
| i |
.openx.net |
1 year |
|
| _ga_X3MG8FKSZL |
.pixarplanet.com |
2 years |
|
| d |
.quantserve.com |
3 months |
|
| na_id |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
|
| na_rn |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
| na_sr |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
| na_srp |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 minute |
|
| na_sc_e |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
| pxrc |
.rlcdn.com |
2 months |
|
| CMST |
.casalemedia.com |
1 day |
|
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
Cookies consent ID:
As most Pixar fans know, John Lasseter was inspired by his own Luxo brand lamp for Pixar’s first short film, Luxo Jr.
Sure wish these people would hold their horses, eh? Man, this is ridiculous…
So will Pixar still be able to use the li’l guy in their logo (as the “I”)?
—Lei
Actually, I think this is fair enough. Luxo Junior has been used a lot more lately with products and the animatronic. If Disney are making money from a Luxo design, then Luxo deserve a cut. Hopefully the two companies can come to agreement that suits both parties. Maybe Luxo could use the Pixar brand to help advertise their lamps?
Well, Pixar’s character is not a Luxo design, it’s John Lasseter’s cartoon of a Luxo lamp if it was a baby. I think what they’re most concerned about is the actual name Luxo being used. But you’d think they’d WANT to be associated with Pixar… guess not.
Actually, the short in which Luxo appeared in was called “Luxo, Jr.” itself, so they had already used its name deliberately.
—Lei
Yes, and they came to an agreement over it over 20 years ago as I pointed out in the article. I should have clarified: the name being used — in a tangible product.
The article pretty much said that. 🙂
But yeah, it’s not the design, it’s the fact that the name is being used on something that Luxo didn’t make. They don’t mind the actual lamp being made, they just don’t want Disney and Pixar throwing around the name if Luxo themselves have no part in it. Greedy…
Actually, that makes sense.
If I made something and then a knock-off was being sold with my product name on it, and I didn’t get any money, I’d feel as if my share was being cut from it. I don’t think it’s as much as using the name as it is making and producing the lamps.
Although, the animatronic is confusing to me. Why they got mad at that, I don’t know. 😕
I have no doubts though that an agreement will be made; I’m sure Luxo will be getting a part.
I don’t think it’s greedy. Luxo ASA has been pretty amiable towards the use of the animated lamp in the logo as well as with the name. But now, this has gone a bit too far. They may have been a little bit upset about not being asked about the animatronic lamp, but it was only when they realized that Disney was going to actually be making working lamps that they realized that in order to protect what they have made, and own, they need to make sure that Disney knows their place in all of this.
Copyright/trademark are the things that you never want to cross in the business world.
Yeah, Luxo’s not being greedy here. “Luxo” is owned by Luxo, and they can do what they want with it. Businesses exist to make money. That’s why they were founded in the first place. Therefore, Luxo has every right to protect it’s name.
Disney are such jerks.
I can see why both sides may be right/wrong. But the real question is, how far is too far. We’ll see how the court settles it. 😉
You would also think Disney Legal would have checked all of this out ahead of time.
Maybe they did and said, screw Luxo, let em come after us. This is a very real reaction as I’ve experienced first hand from other LARGE companies.
I think I agree more with Luxo ASA. Please remember that the lawsuit is them versus Disney – not Pixar. Disney has in the past, even in regards to Pixar themselves, tried to break/twist agreements. Remember when they wanted to take creative control over Pixar’s characters and make straight to DVD sequels?
This was actually one of the reasons that Pixar was bought by Disney – to regain control – oddly enough. If they had not signed back with Disney, any of the characters prior to 2006, would have been controlled by Disney to do what they like with. By allowing themselves to be bought, they were able to sign an agreement stating that any sequels would be made only if, and when, Pixar decided to make them themselves.