Performance
Targeting
Unclassified
Targeting cookies are used to identify visitors between different websites, eg. content partners, banner networks. Those cookies may be used by companies to build a profile of visitor interests or show relevant ads on other websites.
Cookie report
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
__gads |
.pixarplanet.com |
1 year |
This cookie is associated with the DoubleClick for Publishers service from Google. Its purpose is to do with the showing of adverts on the site, for which the owner may earn some revenue. |
IDE |
.doubleclick.net |
1 year |
This cookie carries out information about how the end user uses the website and any advertising that the end user may have seen before visiting the said website. |
DSID |
.doubleclick.net |
1 hour |
This cookie is set to note your specific user identity. It contains a hashed/encrypted unique ID. |
KTPCACOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
1 day |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
mc |
.quantserve.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie is usually provided by Quantserve to track anonymous information about how website visitors use the site. |
KADUSERCOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
3 months |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
CMID |
.casalemedia.com |
1 year |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
CMPS |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
CMPRO |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
na_tc |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
uid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie provides a uniquely assigned, machine-generated user ID and gathers data about activity on the website. This data may be sent to a 3rd party for analysis and reporting. |
ouid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
rlas3 |
.rlcdn.com |
1 year |
This cookie is generally provided by rlcdn.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
uuid |
.innovid.com |
3 months |
This cookie is used to optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites – this exchange of visitor data is normally provided by a third-party data-center or ad-exchange. |
Unclassified cookies are cookies that do not belong to any other category or are in the process of categorization.
Cookie report
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
i |
.openx.net |
1 year |
|
_ga_X3MG8FKSZL |
.pixarplanet.com |
2 years |
|
d |
.quantserve.com |
3 months |
|
na_id |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
|
na_rn |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
na_sr |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
na_srp |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 minute |
|
na_sc_e |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
pxrc |
.rlcdn.com |
2 months |
|
CMST |
.casalemedia.com |
1 day |
|
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
Cookies consent ID:
He’s so quick to compare it to Disney’s diminishing grosses after “Lion King.” That’s really out there. TLK made over 300 mill, and the next year “Pocahontas” made less than 150, HoND just a bit over 100, and “Hercules” a bit less. *That’s* a drastic decrease. To match that “The Incredibles” would have had to have made 170 million, “Cars” a little over 110, and “Ratatouille” a bit less. A Pixar movie on the other hand, has not grossed less than 200 million dollars since “A Bug’s Life.” Disney’s only two to make over two hundred have been “Lion King” and “Aladdin.” That’s a poor comparison.
And his worldwide gross is way off. It’s surpassed “Cars” already. “Ratatouille” did outstandingly well for how poorly marketed it was. It looked like just another talking animal movie from the trailers.
So there’s a live action movie they’re thinking about doing? Isn’t that kind of unusual for an animation studio?
he is right about the short distance between the movie and the dvd, but except that…
i’ve found this article DESPERATE, after the news about the european success of Ratatouille, and the imminent DVD&Bluray releases, and the Leslie Iwerks’ book and documentary…
i really can’t imagine what’s the problem with this guy about Pixar… he quoted the interviews where Bird admits the movie hadn’t success at the box-office… what else could he answer to a journalist?
And than this story of the live action, the “brand fatigue problem”… omg… the only problem for Pixar are Jim Hill and his “insiders”…
As usual, Jim Hill doesn’t even attempt to hide his contempt for Pixar. The title of the article floats a conclusion he pulled out of his hiney — namely, that there is a “brand fatigue problem.”
The article consists primarily of taking quotes out of context to support that conclusion. Yes, he’s desperate, and pathetic. It reminds me of all those tech columnists who are waiting for Apple to produce a dud product, so they can triumphantly proclaim, “Apple’s lost its magic — see, I told you it couldn’t last.”
Why does your classy website even bother to read, let alone serve up free publicity, for that craphound? Even a broken watch is right twice a day, so it’s not a ‘stop the presses’ moment when the egomaniac makes a decent point once in a while.
Please, cease and desist already.