Performance
Targeting
Unclassified
Targeting cookies are used to identify visitors between different websites, eg. content partners, banner networks. Those cookies may be used by companies to build a profile of visitor interests or show relevant ads on other websites.
Cookie report
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
__gads |
.pixarplanet.com |
1 year |
This cookie is associated with the DoubleClick for Publishers service from Google. Its purpose is to do with the showing of adverts on the site, for which the owner may earn some revenue. |
IDE |
.doubleclick.net |
1 year |
This cookie carries out information about how the end user uses the website and any advertising that the end user may have seen before visiting the said website. |
DSID |
.doubleclick.net |
1 hour |
This cookie is set to note your specific user identity. It contains a hashed/encrypted unique ID. |
KTPCACOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
1 day |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
mc |
.quantserve.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie is usually provided by Quantserve to track anonymous information about how website visitors use the site. |
KADUSERCOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
3 months |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
CMID |
.casalemedia.com |
1 year |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
CMPS |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
CMPRO |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
na_tc |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
uid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie provides a uniquely assigned, machine-generated user ID and gathers data about activity on the website. This data may be sent to a 3rd party for analysis and reporting. |
ouid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
rlas3 |
.rlcdn.com |
1 year |
This cookie is generally provided by rlcdn.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
uuid |
.innovid.com |
3 months |
This cookie is used to optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites – this exchange of visitor data is normally provided by a third-party data-center or ad-exchange. |
Unclassified cookies are cookies that do not belong to any other category or are in the process of categorization.
Cookie report
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
i |
.openx.net |
1 year |
|
_ga_X3MG8FKSZL |
.pixarplanet.com |
2 years |
|
d |
.quantserve.com |
3 months |
|
na_id |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
|
na_rn |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
na_sr |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
na_srp |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 minute |
|
na_sc_e |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
pxrc |
.rlcdn.com |
2 months |
|
CMST |
.casalemedia.com |
1 day |
|
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
Cookies consent ID:
Usually Pixar films start at 100% then go down slightly. I hope some more positive reviews start being added to bring the percentage up.
The guy who dissented, also did with Ratatouille, so his review is basically void.
He’s just trying to get views.
Anyway, yes Rach, it will go up very fast in the next couple of days.
I disagree with highlighting that attention-wanting hack’s in this entry. Like bennifer has said, he gave the negative review to Ratatouille (he was the first negative on that one too). He obviously has a bone to pick with Pixar or with quality itself – but letting people know who the lone dissenter was on such a great movie feels like you’re rewarding this idiot.
I request – Please take it down, take his name down, and just hint at how moronic the negative review was (seriously, if you read his review, it really sounds moronic, especially when compared to the others. It’s like he outright lied or was really just looking for something to pick at).
Just so you know, there are now 40 positive reviews on rottentomatoes with Phil Villarrel’s still being the only negative one. Wall-e is now sitting pretty at 98%!
97%!! Those two bad reviews should just be ignored, either way a 97 is extremely good.
Note that the “Top Critics” rating is sitting at 100%, and their reviews are filled with admiring adjectives.