Performance
Targeting
Unclassified
Targeting cookies are used to identify visitors between different websites, eg. content partners, banner networks. Those cookies may be used by companies to build a profile of visitor interests or show relevant ads on other websites.
Cookie report
|
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
| __gads |
.pixarplanet.com |
1 year |
This cookie is associated with the DoubleClick for Publishers service from Google. Its purpose is to do with the showing of adverts on the site, for which the owner may earn some revenue. |
| IDE |
.doubleclick.net |
1 year |
This cookie carries out information about how the end user uses the website and any advertising that the end user may have seen before visiting the said website. |
| DSID |
.doubleclick.net |
1 hour |
This cookie is set to note your specific user identity. It contains a hashed/encrypted unique ID. |
| KTPCACOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
1 day |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
| mc |
.quantserve.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie is usually provided by Quantserve to track anonymous information about how website visitors use the site. |
| KADUSERCOOKIE |
.pubmatic.com |
3 months |
This cookie is generally provided by pubmatic.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
| CMID |
.casalemedia.com |
1 year |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
| CMPS |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
| CMPRO |
.casalemedia.com |
3 months |
These cookies are linked to advertising and tracking the products users were looking at. |
| na_tc |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
| uid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
This cookie provides a uniquely assigned, machine-generated user ID and gathers data about activity on the website. This data may be sent to a 3rd party for analysis and reporting. |
| ouid |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
Social Media sharing tracking cookie. |
| rlas3 |
.rlcdn.com |
1 year |
This cookie is generally provided by rlcdn.com and is used for advertising purposes. |
| uuid |
.innovid.com |
3 months |
This cookie is used to optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites – this exchange of visitor data is normally provided by a third-party data-center or ad-exchange. |
Unclassified cookies are cookies that do not belong to any other category or are in the process of categorization.
Cookie report
|
Name |
Domain |
Expiration |
Description |
| i |
.openx.net |
1 year |
|
| _ga_X3MG8FKSZL |
.pixarplanet.com |
2 years |
|
| d |
.quantserve.com |
3 months |
|
| na_id |
.addthis.com |
1 year 1 month |
|
| na_rn |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
| na_sr |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
| na_srp |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 minute |
|
| na_sc_e |
.dlx.addthis.com |
1 month |
|
| pxrc |
.rlcdn.com |
2 months |
|
| CMST |
.casalemedia.com |
1 day |
|
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
Cookies consent ID:
Remember the big Toy Story display at the Las Vegas International Licensing Fair we posted about last week? 
sadly, JHM is anything but a reliable source. for example, did he or did he not say Wall*E would be appearing on the Tony awards? or characters would be returning to LTT or anything in the unofficial guide to WDW…
Oh… My… God!
Oh. My. God. Indeed.
That is a groan, not from any happiness.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
What other sequel could it be other than Toy Story 3 and Cars 2? In a way I’m excitied but most of all, it seems to be a bit un-necessary. I’ve said it before, but Monsters, Inc. had the best ending of any Pixar movie ever. A sequel may take away from that. But I’ll try to wait until I see it before going on about it too much. After all, just look at how perfect Toy Story 2 is.
Btw, really creative writing with this blog lately, Martin. I haven’t had time to comment, but great work! 🙂
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO indeed.
Ugh. Ugh. Ugh.
There are no other words.
With The Pixar Blog, blueskydisney and now finally Jim Hill all point to the existence of MI2 project I think it will be officially announced very soon.
However I refuse to believe it 100% until Pixar and Pete Docter confirm so.
I can’t help but feel inherent danger in this sequel madness. While they may or may not be amazing, I sure hope they at least intend to release originals SOMEWHERE on their schedule… While TS2 is still one of my Pixar favorites, I consider that a fluke in sequel land.
its definitely happening people…I got my sources…although I heard it wasn’t gonna be pete doctor directing. So yeah we’ll just have to wait and see who’s directing.
It’s obvious that Pixar has finally run out of ideas. If this is true, then 3 out of the next 5 Pixar projects are sequels. Yuck. This is worse than the average Hollywood studio.
You know it’s bound to happen. Pixar’s winning streak cannot continue forever. So we should enjoy it while it lasts.
Well, whatever happens, we still have DreamWorks, which tries to release at least one original film each year.
so they will eventually make a sequel out af all their movies BUT the one we actually want to see..
the underminer, anyone?
I don’t think Pixar will pull a Dreamworks here – Newt and The Bear and the Bow aren’t exactly sequels.
Furthermore, as sequel-worthiness goes, MI has always been at spot #2 for me, right behind The Incredibles.
And with Pete Docter directing, I really don’t see anything else but a brilliant film coming our way here.
Then again, everyone probably would have been excited at this point if it weren’t for Cars 2.
I guess until we find out whether that one is any good the uncertainty will continue.
This is sad that so many of you feel this way about a Pixar sequel. Think of it as an old friend – you want to know how they are doing, what they have been up to and what has changed. Pixar makes these amazing characters and stories and to only use them once and never touch base again seems like a waste! We all know that Pixar knows how to tell a story and it doesn’t have to be better than the last story – it’s Pixar and you know it will be good! This is a fan site and for anyone to mock their descision I believe that they are not true fans. You know wether you like the idea of a sequel or not, you will see the movie AND because it is Pixar you know it will be great! Me presonally, I can’t wait to see what adventure Sully and Mike get into and not to mention the new characters that will be introduced. I hope this rumor becomes true!
Jewlesz, just because they don’t have a sequel does not in anyway mean the characters are going to waste.
Also, we are not mocking Pixar. We really don’t want a sequel. Monsters, Inc. ended in a way that a sequel would just ruin it. Some movies need to be left open ended for the viewer to expand on what happens using his own imagination. It’s so much more magical when it’s not defined with a sequel.
Also, to call us not fans because we don’t want a follow up is ridiculous. Fans should be allowed to voice opinion and still be called fans. There isn’t anything out there that we would support 100%…so no one would be fans of anything.
You people doubt Pixar? When have they ever let us down? Why should tihs be any different? I have faith that Pixar will amaze us again, just like they did with Ratatouille, WALL·E, Up, and how they will with Toy Story 3, Cars 2, and Newt, ect.
Why is everyone all like “NOOO!” I’m Excited!
me too! I LOVE MI!
I think I died a little on the inside. Sequels were not the reason that I liked Pixar, and they are the reason that I’m not a big fan of DW.
“Well, whatever happens, we still have DreamWorks, which tries to release at least one original film each year.” – Anon #7?
(caughhackgag) What? Original as in the start for a new line of sequels if the movie does well $wise? o.O
yohoitsjoefosho: Thank you. Had I been on earlier and found this article, I would’ve said the same.
As one critic I read once said, there are films we as fans want to see, and then there are the films we REALLY want. In our heads, we think we want sequels to movies we love, but I would argue that more often than not this desire is not based on some aspect about the original that left them unfulfilled, or thought that something needed to be more fully explored, but rather it is a desire for more for the sake of having more. Thankfully, when Pixar produced it’s only sequel, it made sure there was something left to explore, which gives hope where other studios would quickly just thoughtlessly dish out a repeat – hopefully the sequels on slate will be made for the right reasons and that Pixar isn’t letting up on the gas pedal.
However, the films we really want – and the ones I personally look forward to the most, deep down, are the ones whose universes we haven’t explored at all yet.
Imagine if they announced these sequels sometime after Finding Nemo, and instead of getting “The Incredibles”, “Ratatouille, “WALL-E” or “Up”, we got the sequels we’re only starting to see now, with the other film ideas being forgotten about. Sure, they’re likely to be really good in their own right, but look what great new things we would have missed out on! My most anticipated new Pixar films are not Toy Story III or Cars II, they’re “The Bear And The Bow” and “Newt”.
Their more recent films have pushed the medium forward every time, expanding on our expectations on what surprises animation is capable of.
I used to be part of the large number of Pixar fans who spoke of their desire to see that most desired of sequels, the one of course being “The Incredibles”, but now I have since reneged on that desire, after seeing the studio push themselves to height after height since.
I’ve been to the universe the Incredibles gave us, and I loved it, but I’d rather be surprised now with ideas I don’t even know I like because they haven’t been imagined yet.
It’s a lesson learned in “Ratatouille” when Anton Ego joyfully exclaims: “Surprise me!”. It would be a pity if Pixar forgot the lesson they themselves evoked so well in that film, which is still in my top two favorites in their library.
I’m actually hoping Jim Hill is as wrong on this as he usually is on predicting returns on Pixar films.
I for one am thrilled by the prospsect of MI2. Are sequels necessary? No, and I for one believe that you should never do a sequel for sequel’s sake. But Pixar has proven they aren’t a factory like Dreamworks. They will not re-visit a world or characters unless there is ana amazing story to be told. When TS3 is released, it will have been 12 years since TS2 and the same with MI2.
These films aren’t rushed, they wait for the perfect idea. I think the best evidence is the fact that sequel people expect the most is probably the easiest to do half-way (The Incredibles), and it has not been greenlit yet. I’ve heard great things about TS3, and iger also said things like Ratatouille would nto get sequels. But there are some worlds that are so rich that they should be revisited. Even literary masters like Homer, Edgar Rice Borrough and Arthur Conan Doyle wrote sequels. As long as there is still original fare along the way like the Bear and the Bow and Newt. I’m happy with it.
Didn’t we already hear about this over at Blue Sky Disney like two months ago?
What is Jim Hill going to tell us next? Obama wins the presidency!
i love sequels.. i love to see whats happening with them now… i think a finding nemo 2 would be great!!!